The screen of the a6500 can only be tilted up and down by around 90 degrees and up and down by approximately 45 degrees, respectively. I’ve made a video that demonstrates how to configure animal eye autofocus with the Sony a6400, as well as a demonstration of the feature in operation with my dog Frank.
Both cameras include tilting displays, which allow you to adjust the angle of the screen to make it simpler to film from waist or above-the-head positions. The new autofocus technology, which sounds very good, particularly for face tracking, is the only thing that gives it a win on the stills side. In contrast, the Sony Alpha A6500 is the more « complete » of the two cameras, and it only lags behind in terms of autofocus because it is older. For some of you, the decision should come down to the financial realities of the situation.
Both of Sony’s APS-C mirrorless cameras fall short when it comes to battery life, and none of these cameras manages to break the pattern this time around. The Sony a6400 will track your subject with incredible precision and speed, switching between face recognition, eye detection, and object tracking as your subject travels around the scene. Those that photograph wildlife, sports, or any other action-oriented genre will find it to be a great fit. When it comes to picture quality, both the Sony a6400 and the Sony a6500 are very capable cameras to use.
On the A6500, you may choose between single-shot and continuous focusing modes. The A6500 has a hybrid technology that contains 425 phase detection points and 169 contrast detection points in total. It is equipped with Sony’s 4D Focus technology, which proved to be quick and dependable in our testing, even while shooting sports and demanding subjects like as birds in flight.
Both the A6600 and A6500 include two custom modes on the mode dial, as well as two custom buttons, designated as C1 and C2, on the front panel. A mode dial option for S&Q is available on the A6600 and A6400, however it is not available on the A6500. The A6500 and A6400 both include a panoramic mode selectable through the mode dial, however the A6600 does not have such a capability. Due to the fact that phase-detection autofocus is substantially quicker than contrast detection autofocus, clearer photographs may be captured. The camera’s vibrations are detected by gyroscopic sensors, which are used to provide optical picture stabilization.
Slow-motion is an artistic video effect that gives the impression that time is moving more slowly. It is accomplished by recording a video at a frame rate that is greater than the typical playback rate of 24 or 30 frames per second. Frame rates for slow-motion recordings may range from 60 frames per second (fps) to 960 frames per second (fps), depending on the camera’s capabilities.
Would the price difference allow you to purchase a high-quality gimbal such as the Zhiyun Crane or the FeiyuTech A1000? If you shoot a lot of video, having one of them will improve your results more than any other switch between the two options available. When compared to the Sony Alpha A6500, the Sony Alpha A6400 may seem to be a little on the flimsy side. Using a motorized gimbal rather than sensor stabilization, which is often only intended to counteract mild motion, is the only option to get ultra-smooth film when shooting with a handheld camera. Such systems were often designed with still images in mind rather than video in mind.
DxO has evaluated the Sony A6400 and Sony A6500 sensors, and the findings suggest that the A6500 has a superior overall score of 85, which is two points higher than the A6400’s score of 83. It produces the same picture quality as the previous model, has extremely good focusing, and has outstanding video quality. The possibility exists that the price may decrease even more, making it more intriguing. This implies that whether you half-press the shutter button or use the back focus button, Eye AF will operate in real time on your camera. It is not necessary to assign the function to a custom button, as was the case with the A6500.
In comparison to the A6500 and A6400, the Sony Alpha A6600 is the company’s most recent and highest-end APS-C mirrorless camera. The following is a side-by-side comparison of the rear views of the Sony A6400 and Sony A6500. The front view size comparison of the Sony A6400 and Sony A6500 is shown in the table below.
In addition to providing a better picture, a greater screen resolution makes it simpler to evaluate your images. Take a look at each of these cameras in turn, learning about their backgrounds and how well they perform in various types of photography and videography. Sony has a habit of designing a camera and then releasing version upgrades while keeping the same fundamental form factor in place.
According to Sony, the a6500 takes 0.05 seconds to acquire autofocus, whilst the a6400, on the other hand, takes just 0.02 seconds. Due to the fact that I am lucky enough to possess both of these cameras, I can testify to the significant increase in AF performance that the a6400 provides. A6400 and A6500 picture quality are almost identical, with just a little variation in color depth. Its CPU is capable of controlling Sony’s real-time Eye AF and tracking systems, as well as the new Animal Eye AF system, which the a6500 is unable to achieve.
My requirements did not allow me to consider the a6400 as an appropriate upgrade route from the a6500. In an unusual turn of events, I was able to get one for free… However, it has not replaced my a6500 and I do not expect it to do so in the near future. The a6000 or other early crop bodies are a no-brainer for anybody looking to upgrade from a6000 or other earlier crop bodies, for example.